Powered by Blogger.

[新聞] Joss Whedon On Maybe Killing A Marvel Icon In Avengers: Age Of Ultron「復仇者聯盟2」也許會有成員領便當?

新聞來源:Joss Whedon On Maybe Killing A Marvel Icon In Avengers: Age Of Ultron

「復仇者聯盟2」也許會有成員領便當?

這篇翻譯我可能會改很多次,因為有些地方一直覺得自己翻得不是很流暢,但大致上的意思不會相差太多,以下簡略翻譯新聞內容,如有錯誤還請指正。


Director Joss Whedon isn’t known to be shy about killing off characters in his movie and television projects. In fact, Whedon actually teased “death, death, and death” for the Avengers sequel during a recent question and answer session.
導演 Joss Whedon 不知是否如為人所知那般不敢在自己的電影作品跟影集裡發便當給角色。事實上,在最近的訪談中 Whedon 已經對此做出回應:他將在復仇者聯盟的續集裡玩弄角色們的生殺大權。

導演大人不要學虛淵啊!

As part of a lengthy interview in the current issue of Entertainment Weekly, Joss Whedon addressed if he could actually kill off a Marvel icon. Whedon said, “I’m always joking about that. Um…maybe?”
最新一期娛樂週刊的訪談中, Joss Whedon 說:如果真能賜死一個 Marvel 英雄,雖然我總是開玩笑,但這次說不定.....嗯?

Whedon added, “But I’d have to have a really good reason, a really great sequence for [Marvel executives] to go, ‘We’ll cut off a potential franchise, that’s fine!’ They know as any good studio does, that without some stakes, some real danger, how involved can we get? We don’t just rule it out across the board, but neither is the mission statement ‘Who can we kill?’ We try to build the story organically and go, ‘How hard can we make it on these people?’ You go to the movies to see people you love suffer-that’s why you go to the movies.”
Whedon 又補述:不過,我必須要有一個非常好的理由,一個相當好的起承轉合去說服 Marvel 高層,我們會先排除繼有版權的角色,那沒有關係!這些角色的故事發展都有優良的團隊在經營,沒有風險或危機,那麼,我們要如何說服群眾讓這些角色捲入危險之中呢?我們不能只是全面性地排除原有設定,但也不能像宣讀宗旨:我們可以殺誰?就毫無根據賜死角色。我們試著創造原創性劇情並讓其發展,對這些角色做出這樣的決定將有多困難?你們會在電影裡看到自己喜愛的角色受難,這也是為什麼你們要進電影院的原因(親眼驗證這一切)。

Judging from Whedon’s answer about “cutting of a potential franchise,” it’s probably likely that characters like Captain America, Thor, and Iron Man with proven franchises are pretty safe. However, with characters like Hawkeye, Quicksilver, and Scarlett Witch that Marvel doesn’t appear to be developing as standalone franchises, there’s no telling what Whedon might do.
根據 Whedon 所說的「排除繼有的版權」,它聽起來似乎是指像美國隊長、索爾或者鋼鐵人這類有專屬獨立故事的角色就會相當安全,然而鷹眼、快銀或是緋紅女巫這類 Marvel 還尚未發展專屬個人故事的角色,就不知道 Whedon 將會怎麼做了。

會怎麼做?

鷹眼會加戲!!!!!!!!!!

導演說的!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

後面這一段是記者的猜測
就導演所說的看來,預定會拍續集的角色就不會領便當,例如:高層預定有「美國隊長3」 就不能在復仇者聯盟2把美隊寫死。(也是啦!這樣會無法連戲XD)
這麼說來,其實鋼鐵人也很危險啊!
畢竟RDJ沒要續拍,再加上第三集很明顯是一個收尾,所以.....嗯?
總之,後面那段是記者的猜測而非導演親自說出口
我是不會在意記者突然點名鷹眼的。(磨刀霍霍(喂!!! XDDDD



補充:
franchise這個字在電影是特指取得情節虛構(小說、漫畫、電玩...等)作品的授權
所以我把翻譯直接簡稱為"版權"比較好讀。

取得的版權會分取得像是可以翻拍作品或是出週邊的不同
所以「復仇者聯盟2」中的緋紅女巫,在漫畫中她是萬磁王的女兒
可是電影授權的關係(X-MEN版權在福斯,復仇者版權在漫威)
因此導演JOSS寫得時候就不可以在復仇者裡說緋紅女巫是萬磁王的女兒,因為沒有取得版權!
也就是說,如果你問復仇者裡的緋紅女巫:哈囉~妳爸爸是誰?
她會回答:
「我和我弟是送子鳥叼來的哦,啾咪!(^.<)」



希望緋紅女巫大人有大量不要生氣(。-人-。)

No comments: